Vegan Sugar
We received a comment from one of our readers (hi Addie) questioning the validity of PETAs list of "I Can't Believe It's Vegan." She says she used to use that site as a reference tool, but has since learned that sugar is absolutely not vegan, and since it is in many of the products on their website, she feels that the list does not give an accurate portrayal of vegan products. "I researched the heck out of sugar to save those white Oreos for myself (an item listed on the site as Vegan), but finally had to just let them go
." Well Addie, you can put your Oreos back on your shopping list.
Most refined white sugar is processed over bone char and that rules it out as a vegan product. However, there are sugars that are not. These are the brands of sugar we know to be vegan:
- Wholesome Foods
- Florida Crystals
- Hain Organic Powdered Sugar
- Jack Frost
- Country Cane
- Supreme
- Southern Bell
- 365 (the Whole Foods house brand).
You can use these tidbits to help you navigate through the sugar aisle: Beet sugar is vegan. Raw sugars or turbinado are also vegan. Other acceptable vegan sweetners include:
- date sugar
- rice syrup
- fructose
- corn syrup
- succanat
- barley malt
- molasses
- maple syrup
- agave nectar.
C&H refines their sugar over bone char, so they are definitely not a vegan option. And supermarkets buy their private label sugars from a variety of refineries, so it is likely they are not vegan. Brown sugar is usually made from refined white sugar with molasses added. So if you know the manufacturer to use bone char in refining their white sugar, you can bet the brown sugar will not be vegan either.
Since the processing methods are not indicated on the packaging, it is very difficult for consumers to know which sugar is indeed vegan. And it becomes much more difficult to make that determination when buying packaged foods. If the ingredient list contains beet sugar or evaporated cane juice instead of "sugar", you're good to go. If the list says sugar, you have to decide for yourself. You can do the legwork and contact the individual manufacturer, but it's unlikely that you will get an honest answer. Most manufacturers source out sugar that is cheapest at the time, and so they don't even know how it was processed, also the sugar used may vary from batch to batch.
I trust Peta to have actually contacted the manufacturer and done the legwork. If they give a product their seal of approval, that is good enough for me. But then again, I'm not all that concerned with by-products (I do my best to avoid them, but don't make myself crazy about them. I do however strictly avoid milk byproducts especially caseine). Bone char is a cheap throw away. Once animals are no longer slaughtered for food, I would expect the refining of sugar to be done in some other manner. No one is going to raise animals for their bones. It wouldn't be economically viable.
If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!
RELATED POSTS:
- Is Splenda Vegan?
- 8 Things You Can Do To Cut Your Risk Of Cancer
- Living Longer and Better
- Kosher Doesn’t Mean Vegan
- Fight Cancer - Eat Vegan
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.
Like this post? Subscribe to my RSS feed and get loads more!
15 comments
SeitanSaidDance on Saturday, July 11, 2009 at
According to this PDF (which is from 2007 and may be outdated) some brands that generally use bone char have a few options where they don’t (e.g.: C&H’s organic sugar is listed as OK).
http://www.vrg.org/journal/vj2007issue4/VJ4_2007-Sugar.pdf
addie on Saturday, July 11, 2009 at
That is the clearest, finest, most thorough explanation of anything I have ever gotten in my life! lol
And I really appreciate the list of companies which sell Vegan sugar.
I was finding it very hard, at times, to get to the bottom of some companies ways and finally just threw up my hands in defeat.
Thank you
B)
TRISTAN on Sunday, July 12, 2009 at
PETA was charged with animal cruelty in 2005 when two of their employees lied to people about finding homes for their dogs and cats. PETA employees then euthanized the animals, including kittens and puppies, put the bodies in trashbags, and threw them into dumpsters behind groceries stores. I wouldn’t believe anything they say.
I avoid all so called products that come from the death of the animal just as I would if these “slaughterhouse by products” were composed of humans who had suffered a horrible death.
addie on Sunday, July 12, 2009 at
The bi-product argument is interesting and I had not thought about it much before, but it seems to miss a major point.
The bi-product of a horrible, horrible life is nothing that feels, to me, okay to use. The cotton that slaves provided, would be sold and much more, no matter what, so buying that cotton did not make for more slaves, Holocaust victims were killed no matter what, would you want one of the lampshades made out of the skin of the murdered from a German Camp?
–I am not saying I am right, just how I feel about bone char and the idea of bi-products, from what I can figure out, so don’t yell at me B)
addie
Lane on Wednesday, July 15, 2009 at
Hi SeitanSaid,
Thanks for the info. I’ve written C&H and have yet to receive a response. Will update the post when/if I do.
Lane on Wednesday, July 15, 2009 at
Hi Addie,
Glad you find it informative
addie on Wednesday, July 15, 2009 at
Vegan Beware–
Yesterday I had those white Oreo’s, thanks to you!
Want my Dachshund:)
addie B)
Lane on Wednesday, July 15, 2009 at
Hi Tristan,
Thanks for the info on PETA. Personally, I’m not a supporter of their methods. More often than not I think their advertising has the adverse effect of their intent. But I still think their list of foods that are vegan is a valuable resource.
As I said in my post, we do our best to avoid animal byproducts. But I know that even if I ask my waitress, I’m not likely to find out if the products I’m ordering at a restaurant are truly vegan or otherwise. So I do my best, but I don’t make myself crazy.
Lane on Wednesday, July 15, 2009 at
Hi Addie,
First, we don’t yell here. You are entitled to your opinions. And you can even tell me I’m wrong…
Re by-products: Cotton was the primary crop, so reducing your consumption ultimately reduces the total consumption of the product. You vote with your wallet. I believe that by not eating meat, I am saving x amount of animals from death, simply because the demand is reduced. (I believe in the laws of supply and demand.) So buying cotton at that time would have kept up demand.
The holocaust victim lampshades are an extreme example of by-product, since those people were being slaughtered regardless of the quality of their skin, and most of the skins wound up being “thrown away.” And no, I would not by that, but I don’t buy leather either (not a byproduct). Perhaps over time I will feel differently about animal byproducts. Since it is taboo, and a crime to kill a human, but it is not to kill an animal, I can’t equate the two. I know plenty of people who can and do, and will tell me this doesn’t make me a true vegan. As I stated in my post, I believe that byproducts are used primarily because they are so inexpensive. Once animals are no longer slaughtered for food, those cheap by-products will become much more expensive and manufacturers will look to other, less expensive alternatives.
addie on Wednesday, July 15, 2009 at
Lane–
When I first became Vegan I ate very little because I was afraid of making any mistakes. Very little. lol
I’m slowly learning to be more like you - not making myself nuts over every bite or byproducts. After all a person has to eat, right?
addie B)
Marija on Thursday, July 16, 2009 at
Thanks for taking the time to post this. I had no idea there were all these kinds of sweeteners.
I’m printing the list for my next trip to Whole Foods.
Much appreciated!!
Kim on Friday, July 24, 2009 at
RE: PETA and the animals left in dumpsters - my understanding is these were animals pulled from kill shelters in South Carolina that were too ill to adopt out, and would have been killed by gas or gunshot. These workers were trying to provide them a more peaceful death. There has never been any evidence presented to the contrary.
Was it wrong to leave the bodies in a dumpster? Yes. Should PETA be involved personally with making these decisions about euthanasia and carrying it out themselves? I prefer they didn’t, since it provides fodder for such rhetoric as was posted here, and all around the net, that is used to discredit animal advocacy in general.
My anger doesn’t lie with PETA, but with the breeders who keep producing more animals for profit while animals are being killed every second in shelters and “owners” who don’t take responsibility for the animals in their care - disposing of them like garbage.
I don’t concern myself much with sugar. If I eat something processed and sweetened it’s generally of a better quality that doesn’t use recfined sugar anyway. Sugar in general should be avoided, although I know that’s hard!
Kim on Friday, July 24, 2009 at
Mary over at Animal Person http://www.animalperson.net/ has some recent entries about PF Changs and sugar - some really enlightening comments from readers included. I recommend checking those entries out.
Lane on Monday, August 10, 2009 at
Hi Addie,
Yes, first you’re so overly cautious about things. Once you get the hang of it, it seems that most people relax a bit.
Hi Marija,
Glad this was of use to you.
Lane on Monday, August 10, 2009 at
Hi Kim,
thanks for providing that info on PETA.
Yes, sometimes their methodology seems to be at odds with their mission!
Interesting info on PF Changs… It points to Jane’s continuing comment that if you are not preparing the food, you don’t really have much control. People either don’t know, are misinformed, or don’t care.
We try to be very specific when ordering, and hope for the best.