<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lobsters Feel Pain Too</title>
	<atom:link href="http://veganbits.com/animal-rights-lobsters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://veganbits.com/animal-rights-lobsters/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 03:43:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lane</title>
		<link>http://veganbits.com/animal-rights-lobsters/comment-page-1/#comment-488</link>
		<dc:creator>Lane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 21:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://veganbits.com/animal-rights-lobsters/#comment-488</guid>
		<description>Hi Amy, 
Thanks for your comment.
Actually Jane and I did read the entire article.  I started writing a response to your comment, and wound up with too much for this small area.  So, I wrote &lt;a href=&quot;http://veganbits.com/pain-and-suffering-the-lobster-revisted/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;today&#039;s post&lt;/a&gt; in response to you.  
But I have to say, I don&#039;t agree that Professor Elwood is using bad science.  It is not at all uncommon for different researchers to come up with different conclusions.  
I chose to write my post based on the conclusion I came to after reading  a number of different research articles.  You could argue that it makes me a poor journalist for not presenting the other side of the argument... but I believe in the results I presented.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Amy,<br />
Thanks for your comment.<br />
Actually Jane and I did read the entire article.  I started writing a response to your comment, and wound up with too much for this small area.  So, I wrote <a href="http://veganbits.com/pain-and-suffering-the-lobster-revisted/" rel="nofollow">today&#8217;s post</a> in response to you.<br />
But I have to say, I don&#8217;t agree that Professor Elwood is using bad science.  It is not at all uncommon for different researchers to come up with different conclusions.<br />
I chose to write my post based on the conclusion I came to after reading  a number of different research articles.  You could argue that it makes me a poor journalist for not presenting the other side of the argument&#8230; but I believe in the results I presented.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy</title>
		<link>http://veganbits.com/animal-rights-lobsters/comment-page-1/#comment-484</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 07:26:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://veganbits.com/animal-rights-lobsters/#comment-484</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m vegan and believe that when in doubt, assume sentience...but the study about lobsters and pain was actually inconclusive, as you can see if you read the whole article.  I don&#039;t like to see bad science used to support a good cause...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m vegan and believe that when in doubt, assume sentience&#8230;but the study about lobsters and pain was actually inconclusive, as you can see if you read the whole article.  I don&#8217;t like to see bad science used to support a good cause&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lane</title>
		<link>http://veganbits.com/animal-rights-lobsters/comment-page-1/#comment-482</link>
		<dc:creator>Lane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 22:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://veganbits.com/animal-rights-lobsters/#comment-482</guid>
		<description>I believe there is (coming) a slow paradigm shift in thinking.  We have evolved from people who needed to eat whatever was available to them (hunter/gatherer).  As our species has and continues to evolve, we will, hopefully, become more compassionate to all beings.
Compassion aside, global warming could be a good leaping off platform to get people to move away from a meat-based diet.  And once that happens, perhaps we can wean ourselves completely from our dependence on animal products.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe there is (coming) a slow paradigm shift in thinking.  We have evolved from people who needed to eat whatever was available to them (hunter/gatherer).  As our species has and continues to evolve, we will, hopefully, become more compassionate to all beings.<br />
Compassion aside, global warming could be a good leaping off platform to get people to move away from a meat-based diet.  And once that happens, perhaps we can wean ourselves completely from our dependence on animal products.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sat</title>
		<link>http://veganbits.com/animal-rights-lobsters/comment-page-1/#comment-481</link>
		<dc:creator>Sat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 17:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://veganbits.com/animal-rights-lobsters/#comment-481</guid>
		<description>In response to Wallace&#039;s question: many don&#039;t think animals have any moral standing. It&#039;s sad, but some people just don&#039;t think animals are more important than our appetites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In response to Wallace&#8217;s question: many don&#8217;t think animals have any moral standing. It&#8217;s sad, but some people just don&#8217;t think animals are more important than our appetites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

